Volvo Cars - A Look At The S40 And V40
Volvo S40 and V40 as used cars are the flavor of their design. I think it's the famous Swedish producer car has a unique design with other existing models, and the places where the style is different from other car manufacturers are competing. When Ford Motor Company has agreed to acquire the Swedish company car in the late nineties, early in 2000, had a different vision of how they wanted to see the vehicles. Watch the Volvo today shoebox designed there were no more.
Volvo S40 cars:
Ford wanted his Volvo operations in order to develop a car that could compete in the North American market compact. When both models were officially launched in 2000, Volvo used a 1.9-liter four-cylinder that has been turbocharged. Some of the bad reviews I saw on various websites, suggesting that the engine is not powerful enough, it lacks the speed to compete with the likes of a BMW 3-Series or Mercedes-Benz C- Class. The only thing I got out with the exploration of this particular brand was how these statistics Volvo cars have fuel.
I found a couple of fuel statistics for the years 2000 and 2004. In 2000, the Volvo S40 and V40 were 10.5 liters per 100 kilometers in city driving and 6.6 liters per 100 kilometers, and the highway. In 2004, it was the fuel of 10.9 liters per 100 kilometers crew driving in the city and 7.3 liters per 100 kilometers, and the highway. If there is a reason, or the like to buy one of these Volvo models, it is because what you save fuel by filling a car at service stations.
Take a look at some of the advantages and disadvantages of the Volvo S40 and V40.
1 - There is a problem with the noise of hammering from the front wheel suspension.
2 - It 'just to give an average rating of credit of a used car with several automotive Web sites.
3 - There is a problem with the climate control module, the fan stops rotating, or only one speed.
4 - It was to give a good rating from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety organization for its frontal crash test done.
As the Volvo S40 and V40 is an average car at best, I see nothing that suggests it is a good used car.
Volvo S40 cars:
Ford wanted his Volvo operations in order to develop a car that could compete in the North American market compact. When both models were officially launched in 2000, Volvo used a 1.9-liter four-cylinder that has been turbocharged. Some of the bad reviews I saw on various websites, suggesting that the engine is not powerful enough, it lacks the speed to compete with the likes of a BMW 3-Series or Mercedes-Benz C- Class. The only thing I got out with the exploration of this particular brand was how these statistics Volvo cars have fuel.
I found a couple of fuel statistics for the years 2000 and 2004. In 2000, the Volvo S40 and V40 were 10.5 liters per 100 kilometers in city driving and 6.6 liters per 100 kilometers, and the highway. In 2004, it was the fuel of 10.9 liters per 100 kilometers crew driving in the city and 7.3 liters per 100 kilometers, and the highway. If there is a reason, or the like to buy one of these Volvo models, it is because what you save fuel by filling a car at service stations.
Take a look at some of the advantages and disadvantages of the Volvo S40 and V40.
1 - There is a problem with the noise of hammering from the front wheel suspension.
2 - It 'just to give an average rating of credit of a used car with several automotive Web sites.
3 - There is a problem with the climate control module, the fan stops rotating, or only one speed.
4 - It was to give a good rating from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety organization for its frontal crash test done.
As the Volvo S40 and V40 is an average car at best, I see nothing that suggests it is a good used car.
12:50 AM
|
Labels:
Volvo Car
|
This entry was posted on 12:50 AM
and is filed under
Volvo Car
.
You can follow any responses to this entry through
the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response,
or trackback from your own site.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment